![]() |
NO-REST
Networked Organisations - Research into Standards and Standardisation |
![]() |
|
|
|||
|
Project Newsletter 3
|
|
||
|
It's been a while since our previous Newsletter, and quite a bit has happened since then. Let's first go through the past events chronologically, and then have a look at the project's current achievements. Project Workshop 'Towards an Impact Assessment of Standards' This
workshop took place on November 25, 2004 at the CEN Management Centre,
in Brussels. It was well attended, with 25 experts from 7 European countries
participating. Judging by the discussions and the comments the presentations
were also well received. See the slides
of all presentations. Annual Project Review The annual review of the NO-REST project took place on February 21, 2005 in Geneva (in conjunction with the Interop - ESA conference; see below). The review was conducted in a very friendly atmosphere. Overall, the evaluators seemed to be quite content with the project work - "Overall conclusion: the project has a good probability of success and achieving the agreed goals. Due to its pioneer character and the very specific area with little material available progress is slower than expected". The latter comment is certainly valid, and the project is adopting appropriate counter-measures. The same holds for other sound and helpful comments made by the evaluators; they will also be addressed appropriately. Workshop: 'Interoperability Standards - Implementation, Dynamics, and Impact' This workshop (organised by NO-REST) was held in conjunction with the Interop-ESA conference on February 22, 2005 in Geneva. It aimed at getting a better understanding of the impact ICT standards have on networked organisations, striking a balance between academic rigor and practical relevance. Researchers and practitioners (from both industry and standards setting bodies) attended and presented their ideas and views. To this end, the presentations first discussed interoperability issues and their relation to standardisation. |
A general overview
was followed by papers discussing the different dimensions of software
interoperability, from an economic perspective. Subsequently, issues in
RFID standardisation were discussed. With RFID being an extremely hot
topic, such standards issues are rather high on the agenda of everyone
wishing to promote this technology. Other papers discussing
specific cases followed. These included B2B standardisation, both sectoral
and general, and IPv6 addressing issues. Although these topics are rather
dissimilar, all studies highlighted the importance of standards in the
quest for interoperability. The approach to achieve
interoperability through standards is further complicated by the fact
that standards, once passed, are not set in stone. Rather, they can develop
over time, either by means of e.g., new versions or addenda, or through
implementation and use. The sources of such standards dynamics were thoroughly
discussed. An analysis of the effects of the dynamics of JTC1's standards
maintenance process highlighted the former, and different cases on mobile
communication standards analysed the changing dynamics associated with
standards in the larger context of the evolution of mobile communications.
This was complemented by an analysis of the 'standards skirmish' (not
really a battle) about DVD formats. Many (most?) hard
technical interoperability problems have been solved already. Now
we are moving up to interoperability at the semantic level. This problem
was discussed from the point of view of a European standards body. Subsequently,
the relation between standards and the open source movement was addressed.
After all, Open Source Software (OSS) is considered by many as a complement,
or even an alternative, to standardisation. Differences and similarities
between standards and OSS were identified and discussed, and an example
of how to introduce OSS and standards into the government sector was given. The workshop participants
engaged in lengthy and interesting discussions during and after the individual
presentations. It seems to be safe to say that everyone learned quite
a bit, got new insights, and maybe even new ideas for future research. See the slides of the presentations and the draft papers / extended abstracts. |
![]() |
NO-REST
Networked Organisations - Research into Standards and Standardisation |
![]() |
|
Next Project Workshop: 'Impacts of Standards?! - New Insights' This workshop will be held on May 27, 2005 at ETSI's premises in Sophia Antipolis. The overall goal of the workshop is to develop a better understanding of the impact standards may have in the e-business and ICT sectors, and to validate different approaches to assess the impacts of standards. To this end, the focus will be on
Note that registration
is free of charge.
|
For further information please visit the Workshop's home page. Work
Finished This first deliverables
of the NO-REST project on standards impact assessment include D 01: 'Draft
version of guidelines for tools for an a posteriori performance evaluation
of standards for networked organisations' and D 02: 'Draft version
of guidelines for tools for an a priori impact assessment of standards
for networked organisations'. The deliverable first
develops a general standard impact assessment framework developed. To
this end, the problems of impact assessment in the dynamic standardisation
environment are identified first. Subsequently, the different impact dimensions
and the relevant scientific disciplinary approaches are identified. Based
on the understanding that technology foresight can be interpreted as a
mode of an overall impact assessment, a standardisation foresight framework
for a comprehensive impact assessment is developed. The document then
presents an overview and an assessment of existing impact assessment methodologies,
illustrated by a selection of relevant examples. These methodologies are
relevant for the stage of empirical analyses within the standard impact
assessment framework. The deliverable then compare the different methodologies
according to a set of criteria in order to illustrate that specific methodologies
should only be applied in specific contexts and for specific impact dimensions,
which cover primarily the 'economics' domain. An analysis of the applicability
of the different methods for ex-post and ex-ante impact assessments, respectively,
also demonstrates that the two should be integrated. Finally, the deliverable
outlines both the plans and an application of the different methodologies
already realized, as well as the implementation plan for the standard
impact assessment framework. Based on the experiences gathered during
the implementation of the different approaches and methodologies we will
produce guidelines both for ex-ante and ex-post impact assessments for
standards. Similarly, the Deliverables
D 05: 'Report on demand factors for standards for networked organisations'
and D 06: 'Report on the supply side of standards' were integrated
and delivered. We are currently waiting for comments and/or approval. The deliverable puts
the interrelationship between standards and the environments of their
elaboration and use into perspective: an introductory section integrates
the supply and demand sides into an overarching perspective. Here it became
obvious that the separation between these two sides is artificial. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
NO-REST
Networked Organisations - Research into Standards and Standardisation |
![]() |
|
This is not least due to the fact that in many cases those stakeholders which create the demand for standards are also actively involved in their supply. Against this backdrop, the deliverable goes on to consider defining aspects of standards in the dynamic e-business environment. It starts from basic features and functions of standards and links them to the user environment. Here the demand for standards is understood to emerge from a dynamic interaction between three basic stakeholder constituencies: producers, intermediaries, and users. The section takes account of relational, contextual, and motivational variables of these stakeholder groups to generate a set of hypotheses on the interrelationship between these dimensions of e-business organisations and the use of standards. This lays the groundwork
to consider relevant dimensions of the universe of Standards Setting Bodies
(SSBs) which is changing. This standardisation landscape is discussed
in terms of a market for standards, where market dynamics are evolving.
General organisational traits of different types of bodies as well as
a breakdown of functions in the standardisation process are elaborated.
This section then considers the way a set of Standards Setting Bodies
are organised and function. The question of credibility is especially
raised as a factor that might influence the success in this market, as
conceived in this way. Finally, implications for the other deliverables
are drawn and conclusions made. Once approved, the
deliverables will be made publicly available through the project web site. Publications Blind, K.: Interoperability
of Software - Demand and Solutions. To be published in: Proc. WS Interoperability
Standards - Implementation, Dynamics, and Impact. HERMES Science Publishing
Ltd. Blind, K.; Jakobs,
K.: Networked Organisations - Research into Standards and Standardisation.
NO-REST: An FP6 IST Project. Proc. Interop-ESA, Geneva, 2005. Egyedi, T. M.: Standards
Dynamics. To be published in: Proc. WS Interoperability Standards - Implementation,
Dynamics, and Impact. HERMES Science Publishing Ltd. Gauch, S.: + vs. - : Impacts and Dynamics of competing standards of recordable DVD-media. To be published in: Proc. WS Interoperability Standards - Implementation, Dynamics, and Impact. HERMES Science Publishing Ltd. |
Gerst, M.; Bunduchi, R.: Current issues in RFID standardisation. To be published in: Proc. WS Interoperability Standards - Implementation, Dynamics, and Impact. HERMES Science Publishing Ltd. Iversen, E. J.; Tee, R.: Standards dynamics and industrial organization in the mobile communication area: three cases. To be published in: Proc. WS Interoperability Standards - I mplementation, Dynamics, and Impact. HERMES Science Publishing Ltd. Jakobs, K.; Wallbaum,
M.: Selecting the best Platform for ICT Standards Development. Proc. UKAIS
2005, Northumbria University Press.. Jakobs, K.; Wallbaum,
M.: Scores of Rule-Setters - Co-operation and Competition in ICT Standards
Setting. To be published in: Proc. SCORE Conference, 2005. Jakobs, K.: Does an ICT Standards' Success Depend on Its Origin? (invited paper). To be published in: Standards Engineering, vol. 57, no 3, 2005. |